Obama’s Oval Office Gulf Oil Plan: Read The Entire Address To The Nation

June 15, 2010

President Barack Obama laid out his Gulf oil spill strategy to the nation Tuesday night from the Oval Office, just hours after he toured Pensacola Beach.

(To see a video of the speech, click here.)

The following is the full text of Obama’s speech:

Good evening. As we speak, our nation faces a multitude of challenges. At home, our top priority is to recover and rebuild from a recession that has touched the lives of nearly every American. Abroad, our brave men and women in uniform are taking the fight to al Qaeda wherever it exists. And tonight, I’ve returned from a trip to the Gulf Coast to speak with you about the battle we’re waging against an oil spill that is assaulting our shores and our citizens.

On April 20, an explosion ripped through BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, about forty miles off the coast of Louisiana. Eleven workers lost their lives. Seventeen others were injured. And soon, nearly a mile beneath the surface of the ocean, oil began spewing into the water.

Because there has never been a leak of this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology. That is why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our nation’s best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge — a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation’s Secretary of Energy. Scientists at our national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice.

As a result of these efforts, we have directed BP to mobilize additional equipment and technology. In the coming days and weeks, these efforts should capture up to 90 percent of the oil leaking out of the well. This is until the company finishes drilling a relief well later in the summer that is expected to stop the leak completely.

Already, this oil spill is the worst environmental disaster America has ever faced. And unlike an earthquake or a hurricane, it is not a single event that does its damage in a matter of minutes or days. The millions of gallons of oil that have spilled into the Gulf of Mexico are more like an epidemic, one that we will be fighting for months and even years.

But make no mistake: we will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long it takes. We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused. And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy.

Tonight I’d like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward: what we’re doing to clean up the oil, what we’re doing to help our neighbors in the Gulf, and what we’re doing to make sure that a catastrophe like this never happens again.

First, the cleanup. From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been in charge of the largest environmental cleanup effort in our nation’s history — an effort led by Admiral Thad Allen, who has almost forty years of experience responding to disasters. We now have nearly 30,000 personnel who are working across four states to contain and cleanup the oil. Thousands of ships and other vessels are responding in the Gulf. And I have authorized the deployment of over 17,000 National Guard members along the coast. These servicemen and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore, clean beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims — and I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible.

Because of our efforts, millions of gallons of oil have already been removed from the water through burning, skimming, and other collection methods. Over five and a half million feet of boom has been laid across the water to block and absorb the approaching oil. We have approved the construction of new barrier islands in Louisiana to try and stop the oil before it reaches the shore, and we are working with Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida to implement creative approaches to their unique coastlines.

As the clean up continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our coastal states may need. Now, a mobilization of this speed and magnitude will never be perfect, and new challenges will always arise. I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip. So if something isn’t working, we want to hear about it. If there are problems in the operation, we will fix them.

But we have to recognize that despite our best efforts, oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife. And sadly, no matter how effective our response becomes, there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done. That’s why the second thing we’re focused on is the recovery and restoration of the Gulf Coast.

You know, for generations, men and women who call this region home have made their living from the water. That living is now in jeopardy. I’ve talked to shrimpers and fishermen who don’t know how they’re going to support their families this year. I’ve seen empty docks and restaurants with fewer customers — even in areas where the beaches are not yet affected. I’ve talked to owners of shops and hotels who wonder when the tourists will start to come back. The sadness and anger they feel is not just about the money they’ve lost. It’s about a wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost.

I refuse to let that happen. Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness. And this fund will not be controlled by BP. In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent, third party.

Beyond compensating the people of the Gulf in the short-term, it’s also clear we need a long-term plan to restore the unique beauty and bounty of this region. The oil spill represents just the latest blow to a place that has already suffered multiple economic disasters and decades of environmental degradation that has led to disappearing wetlands and habitats. And the region still hasn’t recovered from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. That’s why we must make a commitment to the Gulf Coast that goes beyond responding to the crisis of the moment.

I make that commitment tonight. Earlier, I asked Ray Mabus, the Secretary of the Navy, a former governor of Mississippi, and a son of the Gulf, to develop a long-term Gulf Coast Restoration Plan as soon as possible. The plan will be designed by states, local communities, tribes, fishermen, businesses, conservationists, and other Gulf residents. And BP will pay for the impact this spill has had on the region.

The third part of our response plan is the steps we’re taking to ensure that a disaster like this does not happen again. A few months ago, I approved a proposal to consider new, limited offshore drilling under the assurance that it would be absolutely safe — that the proper technology would be in place and the necessary precautions would be taken.

That was obviously not the case on the Deepwater Horizon rig, and I want to know why. The American people deserve to know why. The families I met with last week who lost their loved ones in the explosion — these families deserve to know why. And so I have established a National Commission to understand the causes of this disaster and offer recommendations on what additional safety and environmental standards we need to put in place. Already, I have issued a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling. I know this creates difficulty for the people who work on these rigs, but for the sake of their safety, and for the sake of the entire region, we need to know the facts before we allow deepwater drilling to continue. And while I urge the Commission to complete its work as quickly as possible, I expect them to do that work thoroughly and impartially.

One place we have already begun to take action is at the agency in charge of regulating drilling and issuing permits, known as the Minerals Management Service. Over the last decade, this agency has become emblematic of a failed philosophy that views all regulation with hostility — a philosophy that says corporations should be allowed to play by their own rules and police themselves. At this agency, industry insiders were put in charge of industry oversight. Oil companies showered regulators with gifts and favors, and were essentially allowed to conduct their own safety inspections and write their own regulations.

When Ken Salazar became my Secretary of the Interior, one of his very first acts was to clean up the worst of the corruption at this agency. But it’s now clear that the problems there ran much deeper, and the pace of reform was just too slow. And so Secretary Salazar and I are bringing in new leadership at the agency — Michael Bromwich, who was a tough federal prosecutor and Inspector General. His charge over the next few months is to build an organization that acts as the oil industry’s watchdog — not its partner.

One of the lessons we’ve learned from this spill is that we need better regulations better safety standards, and better enforcement when it comes to offshore drilling. But a larger lesson is that no matter how much we improve our regulation of the industry, drilling for oil these days entails greater risk. After all, oil is a finite resource. We consume more than 20% of the world’s oil, but have less than 2% of the world’s oil reserves. And that’s part of the reason oil companies are drilling a mile beneath the surface of the ocean — because we’re running out of places to drill on land and in shallow water.

For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. For decades, we have talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked — not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.

The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight. Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be here in America. Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil. And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.

We cannot consign our children to this future. The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash American innovation and seize control of our own destiny.

This is not some distant vision for America. The transition away from fossil fuels will take some time, but over the last year and a half, we have already taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy industry. As we speak, old factories are reopening to produce wind turbines, people are going back to work installing energy-efficient windows, and small businesses are making solar panels. Consumers are buying more efficient cars and trucks, and families are making their homes more energy-efficient. Scientists and researchers are discovering clean energy technologies that will someday lead to entire new industries.

Each of us has a part to play in a new future that will benefit all of us. As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of good, middle-class jobs — but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment. And only if we rally together and act as one nation — workers and entrepreneurs; scientists and citizens; the public and private sectors.

When I was a candidate for this office, I laid out a set of principles that would move our country towards energy independence. Last year, the House of Representatives acted on these principles by passing a strong and comprehensive energy and climate bill — a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America’s businesses.

Now, there are costs associated with this transition. And some believe we can’t afford those costs right now. I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy — because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.

So I am happy to look at other ideas and approaches from either party — as long they seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels. Some have suggested raising efficiency standards in our buildings like we did in our cars and trucks. Some believe we should set standards to ensure that more of our electricity comes from wind and solar power. Others wonder why the energy industry only spends a fraction of what the high-tech industry does on research and development — and want to rapidly boost our investments in such research and development.

All of these approaches have merit, and deserve a fear hearing in the months ahead. But the one approach I will not accept is inaction. The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is too big and too difficult to meet. You see, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II. The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon. And yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom. Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is our capacity to shape our destiny — our determination to fight for the America we want for our children. Even if we’re unsure exactly what that looks like. Even if we don’t yet know precisely how to get there. We know we’ll get there.

It is a faith in the future that sustains us as a people. It is that same faith that sustains our neighbors in the Gulf right now.

Each year, at the beginning of shrimping season, the region’s fishermen take part in a tradition that was brought to America long ago by fishing immigrants from Europe. It’s called “The Blessing of the Fleet,” and today it’s a celebration where clergy from different religions gather to say a prayer for the safety and success of the men and women who will soon head out to sea — some for weeks at a time.

The ceremony goes on in good times and in bad. It took place after Katrina, and it took place a few weeks ago — at the beginning of the most difficult season these fishermen have ever faced.

And still, they came and they prayed. For as a priest and former fisherman once said of the tradition, “The blessing is not that God has promised to remove all obstacles and dangers. The blessing is that He is with us always,” a blessing that’s granted “…even in the midst of the storm.”

The oil spill is not the last crisis America will face. This nation has known hard times before and we will surely know them again. What sees us through — what has always seen us through — is our strength, our resilience, and our unyielding faith that something better awaits us if we summon the courage to reach for it. Tonight, we pray for that courage. We pray for the people of the Gulf. And we pray that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day. Thank you, God Bless You, and may God Bless the United States of America.

Comments

12 Responses to “Obama’s Oval Office Gulf Oil Plan: Read The Entire Address To The Nation”

  1. David Huie Green on June 17th, 2010 4:20 pm

    just so we remember it is a last resort rather than a first reponse

  2. Oversight on June 16th, 2010 6:45 pm

    Here’s some food for thought when it comes to quotes about the government –

    “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

    Thomas Jefferson

  3. David Huie Green on June 16th, 2010 12:05 pm

    REGARDING:
    “It was really unfortunate that Pres. Obama used this crisis to push his political agenda. ”

    He couldn’t help himself. If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail; if all you have is a wrench, everything looks like a nut; if all you have is a politician, everything goes into the agenda.

    He has ideas he wants carried out by appropriate legislation. Sometimes I think he forgets he is the head of the executive branch and it was his job to end corruption or failure to act according to law by his enforcers.

    It takes a while to learn the job. Give him a couple more years and we will see how he matures and learns.

    In the mean time, pray for him. If nothing else, it will help you.

  4. David Huie Green on June 16th, 2010 11:58 am

    REGARDING:
    “We have lost sight of Lincoln’s famous words “A house divided can not stand.” ”

    I know Lincoln quoting it gives it greater weight, but he was quoting another source found in Matthew 12:25.

    24 But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beel’zebub the prince of the devils.
    25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:
    26 and if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?

    It is interesting in the light of the concept that the founding fathers decided to divide up government into a two part legislature, which could accomplish nothing unless they agreed, and an executive which could override the legislature with a veto unless a supermajority overrode him and a judicial branch which couldn’t actually do anything but issue opinions as to the legality of the actions of the others or of accused persons in general.

    Their idea was to divide government so it could not stand against the people. That’s why it functions so poorly. It was intended to function poorly so we sould not be enslaved by it.

  5. pm on June 16th, 2010 10:42 am

    We heard about the corruption of Minerals Mgt. and how they are going to over-haul that agency. How about naming names and prosecution of the government officials that are paid by the government (from our taxes) – Bet you that never happens – they may be fired but with a big fat pension and a consulting job with the oil industry waiting for them once they have been let go. Then how about members of congress and the people who lobby in their halls and private offices.To mention one the daughter of the former vice-president. Truth be told the situation is out of control and nothing is going to change This a death blow for our ecology, economy and peace of mind. Family members and friends are now being laid off from off-shore jobs and if anyone thnks that only affects LA – they would be wrong. Lots of people in FL work those jobs too. We are in a Catch 22 situation that seemingly has no real solution. We have lost sight of Lincoln’s famous words “A house divided can not stand.” Looks like the South will lose this war too. It was really unfortunate that Pres. Obama used this crisis to push his political agenda. Well, if I could cry I would but a long life has taught me that tears are no solution. Dave, you make some valid points hope someone listens to you.

  6. Big B little ill on June 16th, 2010 10:15 am

    In yet another attempt to deflect blame for his administration’s disastrous lack of response to the runaway oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, President Barack Obama is now pointing fingers at Congress.

    “I think it’s fair to say, if six months ago, before this spill had happened, I had gone up to Congress and I had said we need to crack down a lot harder on oil companies and we need to spend more money on technology to respond in case of a catastrophic spill, there are folks up there, who will not be named, who would have said this is classic, big-government overregulation and wasteful spending,” Obama said in an interview with Politico.
    WHO WILL HE BLAME NEXT.

  7. David Huie Green on June 16th, 2010 9:50 am

    REGARDING:
    “It took 20 years to sort through liability after the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska, and in the end, punitive damages were slashed by the courts to about $500 million from $2.5 billion.”

    Notice that is PUNITIVE damages. Compensatory damages weren’t disputed, just how much to punish Exxon for the actions of the sea captain.

    “. . . if we still had the oil man and his Halliburton counterpart . . . ”

    He wasn’t really an oil man although he did speak the lingo, and Halliburton is a good company doing quality work. I find it hard to imagine their cement failing so I wonder what actually did happen. Regardless, it’s hard to imagine either of them, Bush or Cheney, making the situation better or worse.

    David just thinking

  8. Big B little ill on June 16th, 2010 9:10 am

    THE FACTS: An independent arbiter is no more bound to the government’s wishes than an oil company’s. In that sense, there is no certainty BP will be forced to make the Gulf economy whole again or that taxpayers are off the hook for the myriad costs associated with the spill or cleanup. The government can certainly press for that, using legislative and legal tools. But there are no guarantees and the past is not reassuring.

    It took 20 years to sort through liability after the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska, and in the end, punitive damages were slashed by the courts to about $500 million from $2.5 billion. Many people who had lost their livelihoods in the spill died without ever seeing a check.
    Get the rest of the facts on yahoo news

  9. Kevin Bethea on June 16th, 2010 6:26 am

    Let’s just for a minute imagine what this mess would be like if we still had the oil man and his Halliburton counterpart in the White House!!

  10. David Huie Green on June 16th, 2010 12:03 am

    I’m not arguing with what he said in general. We need to quit being reliant on energy resources from other countries. All fossil fuels are inherently finite in extent and will be depleted over time. We need to be sure our workers are safe and following safe practices–at least as much as is possible, since nothing is completely safe.

    We needed to be prepared for a blowout like this and we weren’t. I’m not even sure who was supposed to be prepared for cleanup and containment in the first place. There’s a four cent per barrel tax on every barrel of petroleum used in this country to fund Coast Guard cleanup of oil spills. Was it supposed to be responsible for one like this? If so, why wasn’t it? If not, who was and did they know? Did this little detail fall between the cracks? “I thought YOU were supposed to be doing it!”

    The idea that government will be the solution to all our problems is disproven by the example of how the government got so deeply in bed with the oil industry that they did not force them to be honest. Imagine passing an environmental impact statement which said an oil spill might harm walruses and sea otters. It must be true because there are none alive after the blowout. On the other hand, there weren’t any alive in the Gulf of Mexico before the blowout either. It doesn’t sound like anybody was reading what they were turning in or what was being turned in to them. Everybody dropped that particular ball.

    Don’t let them buy the government off. Not the regulators, not the congressmen, not the senators, not the judges, not the President. But, of course, they will.

    Everybody will find ways around all reforms–IF WE LET THEM.

    The guardians can be corrupted because ultimately, WE ARE THE GUARDIANS. If we don’t insist on honesty and safety, we will not get it. If we say, “Sure he’s a crook, but he’s our crook,” we will have crooks running things and they will not be in our own best interests. If we say, “Sure, he’s not doing his job; but he’s been not doing it so long that he gets to retire in just five more years,” that means we will continue to use people who we know aren’t protecting us.

    This reminds me of the financial meltdown recently. The government regulators often didn’t know as much as the ones they were supposed to regulate, we overwhelmed by the wealth of those people, hoped to get jobs with them after they got enough experience to know what they were doing.

    That’s just two places where we know highly paid federal regulators were not doing what they were paid to do. Where all else aren’t they doing their jobs? Where all else aren’t they doing the jobs they are supposed to do to protect us? Will giving them more power give us better protection or simply more incompetents over us?

    Nits:

    “We consume more than 20% of the world’s oil, but have less than 2% of the world’s oil reserves. ”

    I’m not sure but I think part of what is considered consuming the world’s oil reserves lies in importing petroleum and refining it into things like kerosene, gasoline, asphalt, propane, butane, wax, other products which we then sell to other countries. Thus, it looks like we consumed the raw petroleum when we actually converted it into refined products.

    Also, when folks talk about reserves, they generally say “proven reserves” which means known reserves of economically recoverable product. For example there are oil sands and oil shales which have enormous reserves but the only to get them would be to scrape off 3,000 feet of overburden, dig them up, run them through a kiln to cook out the reserves, catalytically convert them to lighter hydrocarbons. Those are actual reserves but not called proven reserves because they are basically useless.

    And there’s the fact that we don’t know what we don’t know. There may be reserves we do not know about because nobody expected them to be there. This grows less and less likely as means of detecting oil and gas improve but still possible. Vast regions of the world have not been explored yet. I think I saw a few days ago where a survey of Afghanistan turned up over a trillion dollars in mineral wealth, things like copper for one but I think oil was another. Regardless, we actually don’t know what is there.

    For years the only way Mexico knew where to drill for oil was to watch drilling rigs on the American side of the border. I ft hey struck oil, Pemex would drill on the Mexican side. They didn’t use any science or real exploration because that would cost money and the people who paid were not the ones who would benefit.

    Russia is now a powerhouse because they are finally developing some of their petroleum reserves after decades of knowing they had them but having the same lackadaisical attitude as Mexico, or Mexico had the same lackadaisical attitude as the USSR. However you want to look at it.

    “The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon. ”

    I don’t think we safely landed people on the moon, just that we successfully did so. I can’t imagine it ever being safe.

    “and deserve a fear hearing in the months ahead.”
    Should probably be written
    “and deserve a FAIR hearing in the months ahead.”

  11. anydaynow on June 15th, 2010 9:29 pm

    Obama has never been in the deep water oil drilling business so I don’t know why anyone would even wonder why he doesn’t have a plan to stop the oil flow. That’s not his job. BP is in the deep water oil drilling business and THEY don’t know how to stop the oil flow.
    “Showing up here is too little and too late!” What the dickens does that mean?

  12. Oversight on June 15th, 2010 8:56 pm

    NObama… Showing up here is too little and too late! Obama and his staff of highly touted “experts” still do not have plan on how to stop the oil flow; therefore, Obama’s speech and actions are a waste of time.

  NEfb