Latest Headlines
- Semi, Pickup Crash Closes Highway 29 For Hours In Cantonment
- Now That Matt Gaetz Has Resigned After Being Picked For Trump’s AG, Who Will Seek His Seat?
- Thursday Afternoon Update: CSX Railroad Crossing Closures
- Update: Northwest Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz Resigns From Congress After AG Nomination
- New ‘Wind Phone’ In Cantonment ‘Connects’ Grieving Families With Deceased Loved Ones
- Jay Couple Wins State Agriculture Competition, $45,000 Prize
- Century Paying $500 COVID-19 Stipend To Some Employees
- Escambia County Sheriff’s Office Creating Law Enforcement Memorial Plaza
- New Details Emerge In Fatal DUI Crash That Killed 14-Year-Old Cantonment Boy; Driver Released On Bond
- Cantonment Rotary Donates To Hurricane Relief
Andrade Files ECUA Term Limit Bill, Days After Salzman Withdraws Her ECUA Bill
February 25, 2021
Florida House District 2 Rep. Alex Andrade on Wednesday filed a new bill to impose term limits for the Emerald Coast Utility Authority board, days after another ECUA bill was withdrawn.
Andrade’s bill states that anyone elected to the ECUA board for three consecutive terms would not be eligible to run for the next succeeding term.
District 1 Rep. Michelle Salzman filed an ECUA term limit bill earlier this year, but withdrew the bill last week. She called for an extensive operational audit of ECUA and other water utilities created by special acts to gain “a clear picture of how we will move forward with legislation.” The bill had received the support of the local Legislative Delegation comprised of Salzman, Andrade and Sen. Doug Broxson.
A 2018 grand jury report, which was not made public until September 2020, recommended term limits for ECUA. The grand jury found that a lack of term limits “has created a sense of complacency and has fostered an overreliance on the executive director and attorneys.”
“The only recommendation from the grand jury report that requires legislative action was term limits. After Rep. Salzman and Sen. Broxson decided to kill the bill without my input, I decided to propose a compromise and focus on the one grand jury recommendation that needed legislative action,” Andrade told NorthEscambia.com Wednesday night.
In order for Andrade’s bill to advance in the legislative process, a local bill certification form must be signed by Broxson stating it has been approved by a majority of the three-member delegation.
“I hope he signs the form saying he supports term limits,” Andrade said. “If we are for our constituents, we are going to support term limits. I have no idea why any representative in Northwest Florida would not support term limits.”
“I made a commitment to my constituents to promote good government whenever possible, and term limits are one of the best ways to inject new ideas and transparency into our system,” he said.
NorthEscambia.com file photo.
Comments
16 Responses to “Andrade Files ECUA Term Limit Bill, Days After Salzman Withdraws Her ECUA Bill”
This reminds me a lot of what Andrade did to Mike Hill over the 3 Mile Bridge naming. I remember Mike filing the bill to name it after Chappie James, and at the first sign of something not going as originally planned, he jumped in to steal the bill for him. Afterward he ridiculed Mr. Hill with outlandish claims.
I’ve read the explanations from both Sen. Broxson and Rep. Salzman, and what they’ve said makes sense. Both of them stated they planned to re-file the bill next session after the investigation and with suggestions from the audit.
It sounds like Andrade just wants press coverage to look like a savior or is really trying to prevent a more thorough examination of the ECUA policies.
I requested an operational audit and a special investigation into all water districts. I didn’t say I was done – I am just saying THAT bill was not good. The people wanted transparency and accountability. I am working on that. I’m glad some folks can see what this bill DOESNT do. A bill to check a box is NOT how I want to be known.
So Representative Andrade stubbornly obstructs any ECUA reform at all kicking and screaming, then begrudgingly concedes to 12-year term limits (realizing they will have no impact on the special interest he seems to support), and finally makes the puerile move of pretending he has supported reform from the get-go, while blowing his delegation up for no apparent reason (a very harmful and pointless maneuver that does nothing but hurt the interests of the citizens under his delegation). All while pretending that he doesn’t understand why the bill was pulled in favor of a deeper look at more meaningful reform, which might coincide with state-wide measures that could render the previous bill moot.
Sounds about right.
ECUA is grossly negligent. It says so in the grand jury report and the DCA said so in the Bear lawsuit. Term limits would be good for ECUA but 12 years amounts to no change and no controls over a broken utility. Salzman was right to pull the bill, wait for the state to do their audit, and re-file a bill to incorporate the auditor’s findings. The three long-term board members have failed us. Dale Perkins has been on that board for 26 years, never missed a meeting, and knew nothing about what was going on with their attorney and executive director. Lois Benson and Vicki Campbell knew what was going on and chose not to take any action. If you examine the timeline, it’s obvious they didn’t do anything until they had to do something or face a public stoning (figuratively, of course). As the grand jury report lays out the timeline, the attorney missed the deadline to file an appeal in the Bear suit in mid-2014. However, ECUA continued to let the same attorney who missed the email argue the case defending their actions. That took another 3.5 years and hundreds of thousands of dollars. It looks like it wasn’t until after after the grand jury met in mid 2018 that the director and attorney resigned (not fired) and the board finally discussed whether they could take action against their attorney for malpractice.
Term limits are important but Andrade’s bill is short-sighted. I guess he thinks he can preemptively file something minor to stop the more severe measure presumably coming after the state audit. He seems to be driven by donor desire rather than good government. He’s seems to be another paid for politician.
@ coalmine
Sorta like our previous dist. 5 rep, right? 30 plus years at ECUA, voted for every rate increase, while the agency run amuck on his watch. Reference the Grand Jury report.
It’s all about retirement for board members. The term limits should be less than retirement on the job. If you want to lend your talents to be on a board to help for the greater good of the community , do it but don’t stay long enough to be a burden on the tax payers by getting all the retirement benefits. Go back to civilian life and work and pay taxes to support the next person up!!
While term limits seem like a good idea in theory, often times they work out negatively.
1) You have a representative (in any position) who is doing an outstanding job. Unfortunately, they’re now limited to what the term limit is, and chances of getting someone equally outstanding to replace them is slim.
2) Any representative, good or bad, has a limited number of terms. During their last term, what motivation have they to do anything constructive or worthwhile? This typically applies more to political figures but could apply here as well. Chances are, someone who was already not living up to their job requirements, is going to do far less in their final term because they have nothing to lose.
–Food for thought
My vote is for C.L.Lewis. KUDOS!
TY Andrade – Salzman is already failing. Did someone get to her?
Not clearly enough mentioned in the otherwise good write-up above is that the “three consecutive full term” provision would not kick-in until 2034, only affecting those ECUA board members elected starting in November 2022 and then only after three consecutive full terms. The year 2034 seems a long way away. In truth, there should be a constitutional amendment that prohibits anyone from serving in any combination of state, county, special district or municipal elected offices for more than a total of eight years to include all past terms of office in all such elected offices. That would sure “flush” out the system pretty good and get rid of the career politicians who hop from one office to the next. Salzman seems the only sane and uncorrupted member of the local legislative delegation. She should politely refuse to sign the document and then next have a chat with the Escambia County Commission asking if they would like to begin appointing the members of the ECUA board starting in November 2022 when two members end their terms of office. Dale Perkins has done a great job and perhaps whomever is elected to represent District 4 next will appoint him. By November 2024, all ECUA board positions would then be appointed. If the Escambia County Commission adopted a resolution asking that it be done, Broxson and Andrade would be hard pressed to refuse to agree to it. The other benefit of changing to an appointed ECUA board is that it would take the partisan political politics out of picking up the garbage and providing water and sewage service. It makes no sense for ECUA board member positions to be “partisan.” As for Andrade’s support for “three consecutive full term” term limits, he should propose them for the Florida House of Representatives and make them cumulative to include all past terms of office served in the House. He should propose also that part-time members of the Florida Legislature not be allowed to participate in the Florida Retirement System. Elected office should not be a career.
I talked with Salzman several times, thought her was sincere about changing things..
Guess I was hood winked. won’t happen again, i’ll vote for Willie Jr. first.
I definitely support term limits. This will allow for new faces with new ideas to come forth. It will also do away with dictator minds that some of the present board members have. I will in the very near future be one of those new faces with new ideas.
Excellent bill
Re-write the bill to read, “shall not serve in office as a member of the board for more than three elected terms or 12 years.” This would make the board truly term limited. Otherwise, someone could skip an election here and there and still serve 30 plus years the way Andrade’s bill is written.
Broxson is about to be exposed. Will he sign on or remain in the swamp.
At least Andrade is picking up the slack here where Salzman failed. Wonder who got to her or what she is afraid of.