Safety Panel Backs Allowing Armed Teachers In Florida

December 14, 2018

A controversial law that allows trained “guardians” to bring guns to public schools didn’t go far enough — gun-savvy teachers also should be able to have weapons in the classroom.

That’s the near-unanimous view of a state panel created to make recommendations to beef up school security in the wake of one of the country’s deadliest mass school shootings on Valentine’s Day in Broward County.

“You’ve got to have somebody there who can swiftly and effectively neutralize the threat, and that means killing the killer. The only way you are going to do that is if you have a good guy with a gun who can take that action,” Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, who chairs the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Commission, said in an interview Thursday.

Max Schachter, whose 14-year-old son, Alex, was among the students slain at Marjory Stoneman Douglas and who serves on the panel, was the lone holdout in a 13-1 vote on the proposal Wednesday.

“I understand the sheriff’s point that we do need more good guys with a gun on campus,” Schachter said, adding, “nobody understands that wish … more than myself.”

But he said he doesn’t think teachers should carry guns.

“I think they have enough on their plate,” he said.

Debbi Hixon, a teacher agreed. Her husband, Chris, was the Parkland school’s athletics director and wrestling coach and was among the victims.

Teachers already have to prepare students for standardized tests and are responsible for their emotional and physical well-being, Hixon said.

“To add the burden of knowing that you’re responsible for taking out a shooter if they come into your room, even if a teacher thinks they are up to that task, I just think it is unfair to have that expectation for them,” she said Thursday.

Under the proposal, which would require legislative action, teachers who have concealed-weapons licenses — just like school “guardians” already authorized in the law — would be able to get extra training and bring guns to school.

The commission has spent months delving into the Feb. 14 catastrophe, in which 14 teenagers and three faculty members were killed and 17 others were injured.

Confessed killer Nikolas Cruz, a former student at the school, had a lengthy history of interactions with law enforcement and mental-health professionals.

The commission — which spent eight months delving into details about Cruz’s background, the response to the shooting by the Broward County Sheriff’s Office and local police departments and crafting recommendations — met Wednesday and Thursday in Tallahassee to finalize a sweeping report that deals with everything from failings in law-enforcement communications systems to the need for bullet-proof windows in school buildings.

The report was highly critical of the manner in which state, local and federal officials dealt with, or neglected to deal with, Cruz. The recommendations include a number of items focused on better coordination between mental-health, education and law-enforcement agencies, something that was also required in a 2018 law passed in response to the shooting.

Also included in the law — quickly passed and signed by Gov. Rick Scott, weeks after the shootings — was the controversial guardian program, which drew pushback from educators, parents and others. Lawmakers eventually settled on a compromise requiring school districts and sheriffs to approve the program for it into go into effect in counties.

The commission’s approval this week of the recommendation to allow armed teachers on school campuses quickly drew criticism from gun-rights advocates.

Allowing teachers to have guns is “a bad idea,” the Florida Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence said in a news release.

“Instead of arming teachers, whose only job should be to teach our children, we call on the Legislature and Gov.-Elect (Ron) DeSantis to allocate proper and recurring funding for programs that include much-needed counseling and intervention services for young people along with de-escalation techniques and better environmental designs for Florida’s schools,” the group said.

But Gualtieri defended expanding the law.

“There are simply not enough cops to go around. So, if there are not enough cops to go around, then the best way to comply with that is to use the law to its maximum and allow the guardians to perform that function,” he told reporters during a break in Thursday’s meeting.

Under the law, school districts are permitted to hire guardians — people who have special training by county sheriffs but who are not full-time classroom teachers — to patrol school campuses. School boards must approve guardian programs by a majority vote, but sheriffs are not required to provide the training.

The law also requires each school in the state to have at least one school resource officer, which is usually a sheriff’s deputy, or a guardian.

About two dozen of the state’s 67 districts have opted for the guardian program as a cost-saving measure, because deputies are more expensive. Other sheriffs maintain they lack the manpower or funding to assign a resource officer to each school because the law enforcement training is more intensive than the training for guardians.

Decisions by some sheriffs to not implement the guardian program, even after county school officials said they wanted it, frustrated several members of the commission, which was finalizing a 407-page draft report in advance of a Jan. 1 deadline for recommendations to be complete.

Some sheriffs are refusing to train the guardians because their insurance providers have warned about potential liability, according to commission member Grady Judd, sheriff of Polk County.

“What we have right now is the St. Bernard-tail wagging the chihuahua dog,” Judd said. “I’m dadgum passionate about this. … I’m recommending that we change ‘may’ to ‘shall,’ at the request of the majority of the school board.”

The commission unanimously approved the recommendation, which was supported by Schachter and Ryan Petty, whose 14-year-old daughter, Alaina, was one of the slain Parkland students.

“I don’t think anyone should have, including the sheriffs of this state, should have any wiggle room to get around the legislative intent of (SB) 7026,” Petty said, referring to the legislation that passed earlier this year. “Sheriffs shall establish a guardian program.”

by Dara Kam, The News Service of Florida

NorthEscambia.com file photo.

Comments

5 Responses to “Safety Panel Backs Allowing Armed Teachers In Florida”

  1. retired Leo on December 17th, 2018 9:05 am

    I agree teachers have enough on their plate. If a shooting does occur at a school a “good guy teacher” with a gun maybe shot as law enforcement arrives at the school.Money is always the main issue , fund for trained school resource officers.

  2. ThePreachersWife on December 15th, 2018 10:03 pm

    The willing teachers should also be approved by the principal. They would be trained. This gives us another few “good guys” to protect our children. I would hope and pray the people you trust your children with every day are not so unstable that your children would fear their teacher getting angry and shooting them. Good grief!

    Seems like Escambia Co. FL has our schools locked down to only having deputys… if only there were enough to go around. Guardians who are trained sound like a good solution.

  3. Bob on December 14th, 2018 2:53 pm

    Maybe the teachers should have the option to volunteer to be armed in the classroom? Let each teacher decide for themselves if they can handle the responsibility of a firearm!!! Then if you need more people at a school to be armed then hire some/more “guardians”.

    Problem solved.

  4. David Huie Green on December 14th, 2018 1:38 pm

    Note to self:
    Remember to teach children to be perfectly polite to their teachers, avoid sudden moves, and don’t sit too close to the ones who do.

    David for good days

  5. anne 1of2 on December 14th, 2018 9:43 am

    No! Teachers have tempers and hard days at work too. Why put them in a position of a temporary insanity plea? Children do not need this situation.