Latest Headlines
- Another Hire Backs Out Of Century Town Clerk Job
- Community Health Northwest Florida Reopen Monday Following Cyberattack
- Overnight Storms: House Fire, Power Outages
- Christmas With ‘Pipes’ The Kitten Rescued From A Drainage Pipe
- Monday Is Deadline To Register, Change Party For Upcoming Special Primary Election
- McKenzie Estates With 404 Homes Proposed For Cottage Hill
- Ed Spainhower Names Escambia County Employee of the Year
- Ice Flyers Set A Single-Game Attendance Record In Saturday’s Loss To Peoria
- Community Health Northwest Florida Targeted In Cyberattack
- Walnut Hill Convicted Felon Facing Weapons Charge In Atmore
Twelve Constitution Revision Commission Proposals Could Land On The Ballot
April 5, 2018
When they go to the polls in November, voters could face a dozen ballot measures from the Florida Constitution Revision Commission, under a plan advanced Wednesday.
The plan, which received preliminary approval from the commission’s Style and Drafting Committee, groups 24 proposed changes to the state Constitution into 12 ballot measures for the Nov. 6 general election.
The proposed ballot measures, if approved by the full commission, would be added to five proposed constitutional amendments already on the 2018 ballot.
The preliminary groupings combine:
— A ban (Proposal 65) on workplace vaping or electronic cigarettes with a ban (P91) on offshore drilling for gas and oil in state waters.
— Three public-school issues, including an eight-year term limit (P43) for school board members and a requirement (P10) that students be educated in “civic literacy.”
— Three judicial or criminal justice issues, including a measure focused on victims’ rights (P96) and a proposal (P41) that would increase the mandatory retirement age for judges from 70 to 75.
— Two higher-education measures combined with a proposal (P49) to provide survivor benefits to families of police officers, other first responders and Florida-based military members who are killed in the line of duty.
— Four “government structure” measures, including a proposed requirement (P13) that constitutional officers such as sheriffs be elected officials in charter counties and a proposal (P103) for the annual legislative session to begin in January in even-numbered years.
— Three “clean up” measures, including eliminating a defunct reference in the Constitution to a high-speed rail system (P12) and the repeal (P3) of language aimed at preventing “aliens ineligible for citizenship” from owning land. The land-owning provision, which was aimed at Asian immigrants in the 1920s, was never enforced.
The 37-member Constitution Revision Commission meets every 20 years and has the unique power to place proposed constitutional amendments directly on the ballot. Each of the issues considered by the Style and Drafting Committee received an initial approval from the full commission but will ultimately need backing of 22 commission members to go on the ballot.
Along with the issues that have been grouped, the Style and Drafting Committee also decided to let six other constitutional changes remain as “stand-alone” proposals.
Commissioner Brecht Heuchan, chairman of the committee, said two measures were left as separate proposals because they may be amended. One proposal (P39) is an ethics measure, which includes a six-year lobbying ban for former public officials, while the other (P93) would allow the creation of “innovation” school districts.
Four other measures were left as stand-alone proposals because they were initially endorsed by the commission in votes that fell short of the 22 that will be necessary for any constitutional change to be placed on the ballot.
Those measures include a proposed ban (P67) on greyhound racing and a requirement (P29) that employers use a federal verification system to determine the immigration eligibility of workers.
Carey Theil, a lobbyist for Grey2K USA Worldwide, an animal-welfare advocacy group, said his organization supports the racing ban as a separate ballot proposal, while expressing confidence the final vote by the commission will exceed the 18 votes that proposal originally received.
“We’re comfortable being by ourselves,” Theil said. “We do not believe we are at 18. We believe we are in excess of 22 votes today.”
Jack Cory, a lobbyist for the Florida Greyhound Association, which opposes the racing ban, said his group also supports leaving the measure as a separate ballot item. Cory said the proposal “does not belong in the Constitution” and that it should be a decision made by the full commission.
The Style and Drafting Committee also approved the “ordering” of the dozen ballot measures, beginning with the measure dealing with victims’ rights and judicial retirement ages and ending with the proposed greyhound-racing ban.
Heuchan said he looked back over the voting history of ballot proposals since 1998 and could not find any correlation between the ballot position and the fate of the measures, although he acknowledged it was an informal survey. He said other factors seemed to impact the amendments more, including the visibility of the issues with voters and whether advocacy groups were campaigning for or against the proposals.
With the prospect of the commission advancing a dozen additional ballot measures, Heuchan said “decision fatigue” by voters is a factor that the commission will have to consider before its final decisions.
“This whole notion of fatigue is real. It’s a real thing,” Heuchan said.
The five proposed constitutional changes already on the November ballot include a measure to expand the homestead-exemption property tax break, a measure to restore voting rights to former felons and a measure to give voters the final authority in deciding whether to allow casino-style gambling.
The next major task facing the Style and Drafting Committee will be approving the ballot-title and summary language for each of the dozen measures. The titles are limited to 15 words, and summaries cannot exceed 75 words. Courts have held both must not mislead voters.
Ballot measures endorsed by the committee are scheduled to move to the full commission beginning on April 16. The full commission can amend the measures with support from at least 22 of the 37 members.
The commission faces a May 10 deadline for finishing its work.
by Lloyd Dunkelberger, The News Service of Florida
Comments
8 Responses to “Twelve Constitution Revision Commission Proposals Could Land On The Ballot”
Just say no – well, except for the clean up ones.
That seems to be the goal anyway.
what about just enforcing the state Constitution, like ENGLISH is the state language.
That has already been voted on!!!!!!!!!!!
.
how many of these 13 members think we are ” stipud”.
constitutional amends should be a sacred thing not just anything some does or does not want. flordia has a very screwed up constitution and with all these amendments over the years it is impossible to follow.
Vaping and Oil Drilling are separate proposals P65 and P91 respectively. So why are they being lumped into one measure? Why would the state want to ban oil drilling in states waters considering the revenue received from such however. One would think this a way to help keep taxes lower.
More importantly, why are we proposing term limits for School Board members, with no such proposal for state legislators, or US Representatives from the state? I mean God forbid a school board member turn into a millionaire while holding office like our US Representatives do. Or, that yo-yos like Bill Nelson who votes party line forsaking state residents opinions every time, be allowed to serve on a school board for decades.
Then there is the lumping Greyhound Racing and Employee Citizenship Verification into one measure… What in the name of God does one of those have to do with the other, in the context of our constitution?
There should be a term limit on judges not something that allows them to stay longer. They complain of being stressed out, burnt out and over worked all the time. They should go after 12 years.
Surely I am reading this wrong:
37 people have decided that totally different subjects are to be combined on a proposed Constitution amendment!
If so this is the opposite of giving Florida citizens a choice. More like these 37 people are attempting to influence our vote.
If so this is completely unacceptable.
Vaping and oil drilling on same amendment and that is just for starters. What. are these people thinking. I guess they know better than me what I need.