Latest Headlines
- Cat Country 98.7 Is The 2024 CMA Radio Station Of The Year (With Gallery)
- Gonzalez Man Gets Two Life Sentences For Abusing Children
- One Airlifted After Highway 97 Rear End Crash
- Semi, Pickup Crash Closes Highway 29 For Hours In Cantonment
- Now That Matt Gaetz Has Resigned After Being Picked For Trump’s AG, Who Will Seek His Seat?
- Learn How To Break Down A Chicken At The Molino Library
- Escambia Man Dies In Two Vehicle Crash
- Flomaton Man Arrested In Atmore For Possession of Fentanyl, Cocaine
- Escambia Man Sentenced to 25 Years for Fentanyl Trafficking
- Tate High Softball’s Kara Wine Signs With The University of South Alabama
Judge Weighs Third Grade Promotion Policy
August 23, 2016
A state judge is weighing a decision that could shake Florida’s education-accountability system following a marathon hearing Monday in Tallahassee.
After nearly nine hours of testimony and arguments, Leon County Circuit Judge Karen Gievers wrapped up a hearing on state and local policies for allowing students to move to the fourth grade but did not rule on a request that would allow about a dozen students across Florida to advance.
The practical effect of Gievers’ decision, and the appeals that are almost certain to follow, could either validate or shatter the “opt out” movement led by parents who say a state standardized test should not decide whether their children are allowed to move from third grade to fourth grade.
The parents of the students involved in the case told their children to “minimally participate” in the Florida Standards Assessment for third grade by filling in their names, breaking the seals on the tests and then refusing to answer any questions.
Those parents believe state law gives them the right to tell their children not to answer questions on the test. But while the law spells out ways to advance that don’t require passing the assessment, the Florida Department of Education and school districts say that doesn’t give students the opportunity to refuse to take it.
Gievers, who seemed in an earlier hearing to sympathize with the parents, gave no clear indication of how she intended to rule on the request for an injunction.
“You’ve given me a lot to look at, and I plan to do this the right way,” she said.
But the hearing laid bare not only the legal questions at the heart of the case, but the philosophical ones: Is a report card based on a year’s worth of work a better measure of a student’s knowledge, or is an objective test the proper measure? Where is the balance between a parent’s right to control his or her child’s education and the state’s right to determine how to measure learning?
The state cast the lawsuit as one that could undo years’ worth of efforts to end social promotion and make sure that students have mastered reading before going to the fourth grade.
“This is a potential undermining of the entire assessment and accountability system,” said Rocco Testani, an attorney representing the Florida Department of Education.
Those challenging the promotion policy tried to prove that the children deserved to move on without taking the Florida Standards Assessment or one of the alternative tests offered by the state. At times, they even drew on the testimony or words of school district officials and employees.
Rebecca Dooley, who teaches one of the children, testified that the girl’s report card showed she “demonstrated ability at grade level performance for all four marking periods.”
Dooley also indicated the student shouldn’t be forced to repeat material she had already mastered.
“I do not believe it would be in her best interests academically,” Dooley told the court.
Michelle Rhea, the girl’s mother, read from an email by the vice-chairwoman of the Orange County school board that indicated the last-minute rush to put together a portfolio for Rhea’s daughter showed the district had erred.
“The ball got dropped on this one, and the district needs to learn from it and make changes going forward for it not to happen this way again,” wrote Nancy Robbinson, the vice chairwoman.
For its part, the state repeatedly showed that the parents had declined opportunities to have their children take alternative tests. The parents argued that doing so would simply expose their children to the same kind of high-stakes testing that they had tried to avoid by opting out.
State lawyers also tried to highlight how Florida’s retention policy has improved education. Juan Copa, a deputy education commissioner who deals with the accountability system, said Florida’s ranking on national tests and its graduation rate has improved since the state began requiring the tests for advancement to the fourth grade.
Mary Jane Tappen, vice chancellor for K-12 public schools, also testified that there are questions about whether report cards are an accurate and fair measurement of whether students know everything they should.
“The concern is that those decisions are not based on the same scale and consistent from student to student across the state,” she said.
While the hearing Monday was not as emotional as an earlier round of testimony, the lawsuit remains contentious. Even Gievers’ authority to decide the case is in doubt.
Monday’s hearing moved forward despite almost all of the school districts refusing to fully participate. The districts insist that Gievers doesn’t have jurisdiction over their retention polices and have asked for their cases to be heard in their own counties and separate from the suit against the state.
That was one of a barrage of objections covering everything from whether revealing certain information about the students might violate their federal privacy rights to whether Attorney General Pam Bondi should have been formally notified about the case.
Gievers said she would rule on the venue for the case and the request for an injunction as quickly as possible. In the meantime, she swatted away the districts’ objections and pushed ahead, keeping court in session through lunch and into the evening.
by Brandon Larrabee, The News Service of Florida
Comments
10 Responses to “Judge Weighs Third Grade Promotion Policy”
REGARDING:
” If a child is passing with As, Bs, Cs, and maybe even a few Ds…then voila! They should advance. ”
If a child’s subjective grades show he has learned a subject but an objective test show he hasn’t, something is obviously wrong.
If the test actually tests mastery, then that means the child has not mastered the subject.
If the test actually tests minimum standards, then this means the child has not learned to even the minimum acceptable level.
If it does not matter, don’t even bother to teach the subject.
If it does matter, don’t act like it doesn’t.
AND
“The score they receive is based on what all other third graders in the state make. So someone will have to be low.”
If this the way of grading, the “test” doesn’t actually test what was learned.
People know how to test.
If they aren’t actually doing so, they should be treated as the criminals they are.
If they are actually testing learning, they shouldn’t be falsely accused.
Worst is parents using their children as political pieces in a vast game.
David for truly educated children
not lies
Alas, the ugly downside of teaching to a test shows it’s despicable face! If a child is passing with As, Bs, Cs, and maybe even a few Ds…then voila! They should advance. Ditch standardized testing. I taught Music for 3 years, and learning, whether it be math or social studies, just like music, is an art…not a science. Standardized testing is the government’s way of exerting more control over the lives of citizens/subjects. Return it to the local level and watch our nation bloom again. Keep this centralized approach and we’ll be back in the dark ages before long. We’re half way there, now. Just look at our current presidential candidates.
“Pam Bondi should have been formally notified about the case” like she did not know what is going on
The test itself has become more important than what the reason for measurement is in itself
But… I am glad the rest of the world isn’t in la la land
Glad my doctor didn’t opt out- my pilot- my dentist–however Obama evidently did
At 63 years old I still take test for my job to prove the standard of quality of the decisions I make are beneficial to others and myself
And for me working since I was 15 ….its been a great accomplishment I enjoy
We are living I guess in a spoiled world fraught with the “gimme” syndrome
Grow up and get over it
man, thats what i wanna do, any time i feel life is getting too tuff, i’ll just opt out.
since when does a student have to pass a test to graduate to the next higher grade!?! the nerve!!
The kids go to school, do homework or don’t, pass the tests on Friday or don.t. At the end of the 6 weeks the teacher reads the grade book and guess what? The test grades dictate the child has studied or didn’t. This is not rocket science. The children either have the building blocks in their minds or they don’t We used to help each other learn. I remember taking tests at the end of the year which showed the 6th grader actually did math like an eight grader in the second month of the school year, blah, blah, blah. Know what? We stayed on to the next the grade. We loved school. Now the children are scared and stressed. If the children have had good grades all year, pass them! The truth be known, this is just another way of labeling the children from a very young age. Teachers recognize a truly gifted child and they handle it. Give them credit for doing their job!
I was a 3rd grade teacher with Escambia County, FL for 30 years!
The real problem is the test is not a measure of what the student knows based on a standard scale. The score they receive is based on what all other third graders in the state make. So someone will have to be low.
There is a way built into the system to allow any child that has passing grades to be promoted: a portfolio. It is a sample of each standard proving the child does indeed know the skill or concept.
If a student makes sufficient grades throughout the year then that student should be promoted. One test shouldn’t be the deciding factor. I’ve known kids that make excellent grades but do poorly on tests because half of the test isn’t actually taught to them throughout the school year. If the state is going to base a child’s future one one test then they should ensure that everything on the test is covered during the year and not just breezed through or left out completely. If my child made A’s and B’s all year and was failed due to one test we would have a very big problem.
“The concern is that those decisions are not based on the same scale and consistent from student to student across the state,” she said.”
What this is really saying is that we don’t trust your teacher enough to allow him/her to create your test based on what you have learned in his/her class, so we are going to give you a state test.
This will indeed be a case to watch. There is nothing wrong with expectations for students, but when everything comes down to one test, there is indeed a problem.