Latest Headlines
- Homeowner Reportedly Opens Fire On Known Attackers In Bratt Assault
- FPL Seeks To Raise Bills For All Of 2025 To Cover Hurricane Costs; Here’s How Much
- Cat Country 98.7 Is The 2024 CMA Radio Station Of The Year (With Gallery)
- Gonzalez Man Gets Two Life Sentences For Abusing Children
- ECUA Employee Golf Tournament Raises $10K For Children’s Hospital
- Creative Painting: Squeegee Art Saturday At Century Library
- Eagles Vs. Eagles: Ernest Ward Middle Falls To W.S. Neal
- Cantonment Man Sentenced To 25 Years For Child Sex Abuse
- One Airlifted After Highway 97 Rear End Crash
- Semi, Pickup Crash Closes Highway 29 For Hours In Cantonment
Another Judge Rules Florida Death Penalty Unconstitutional
June 11, 2016
For the second time in a month, a circuit judge has ruled that Florida’s new death-penalty sentencing law is “patently unconstitutional” because it does not require unanimous jury decisions for death to be imposed.
Hillsborough County Circuit Judge Samantha Ward on Thursday sided with defendant Michael Keetley, an ice cream truck driver who was charged with murdering two men and injuring four others in 2010.
Florida lawmakers hurriedly crafted a new death-penalty sentencing process this year, in response to a U.S. Supreme Court decision in January that overturned the old law because it gave too much power to judges, instead of juries.
Under the new law, juries have to unanimously find that at least one aggravating circumstance exists in order for defendants to be eligible for the death penalty. The law also requires juries to weigh whether sufficient mitigating factors exist to outweigh the aggravating circumstances, but the law is silent about whether those decisions must be unanimous. The law also requires at least 10 jurors to recommend the death penalty, a departure from the old law, which required a simple majority of jurors.
But, agreeing with Keetley’s lawyers, Ward ruled that the new law “runs afoul” of the Supreme Court decision, which came in a case known as Hurst v. Florida. Prosecutors argued that the requirement to find at least one aggravator, unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt, was sufficient to comport with a previous U.S. Supreme Court decision, in a case known as Ring v. Arizona.
“But it defies logic, and the dictates of Ring through Hurst, to have the jury find one of the prerequisites unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt (that at least one aggravating factor exists), but not the other two prerequisites (that sufficient aggravators exist and that they outweigh the mitigating circumstances),” Ward wrote.
Ward’s decision Thursday was the second time a circuit judge has found that Florida’s new law is unconstitutional. The Florida Supreme Court has also been inundated with arguments about the constitutionality of the law and is poised to decide on the issue.
Miami-Dade County Circuit Judge Milton Hirsch ruled May 9 that unanimous decisions are required in imposing death sentences, rather than recommendations from majorities or super-majorities of juries.
Ward’s ruling dealt with the fact-finding phase of the sentencing process.
The Sixth Amendment guarantee to a trial by jury “unequivocally demands that a jury unanimously find the existence of any fact that subjects a defendant to a sentence in excess of that statutorily authorized by a guilty verdict beyond a reasonable doubt,” Ward wrote Thursday. “Florida’s existing death penalty sentencing scheme is incongruous with this decree.”
by Dara Kam, The News Service of Florida
Comments
6 Responses to “Another Judge Rules Florida Death Penalty Unconstitutional”
God help us all these people needs to have to go before our crooked court system.
I bet they would change their mind real fast.
That just goes to show you how backwards are judicial system is, and their twisted, non-discerning, judgement is, the jury was intended to determine guilt or not, and then the people were charged with installing a wise judge. You certainly don’t see this anymore.
I am for the death penalty but it should just be done away with the way the states are bound trying to use it most die of old age or natural causes.It just cost too much to house them that long.There should be a time limit in years of how long appeals and all can last before they are just put to death but of course all will scream about the one innocent out of the hundreds of heartless killers that may be there.
Some people don’t have stomach for the job & should not be on the bench.
Ridiculous ! I bet if the judge had a member of their family murdered, they would think different about that !! I believe in … An eye for an eye ! Some people are just nothing but evil !!!!!
If I am on a jury I will recommend the death penalty. Back in the day, my Grandfather and others were smart enough to hang them from a tree especially if they had languished in a cell this long. Perhaps it is cruel and unusual to not make a swift decision and carry out a sentence. I believe the framers of the constitution would read this story about the judges and lawyers and tar and feather them and run them out of town on a rail. The criminals would be broken out of the jail by a mob and be swinging in public display. I can respect that. This is beyond being reasonable.