Gulf Power, Other Utilities Continue To Fuel Solar Amendment

October 16, 2015

A political committee pushing one of two competing solar-energy initiatives for the 2016 ballot has quickly amassed nearly $1.5 million, with financial backing from Florida’s major electric utilities.

The committee, “Consumers for Smart Solar,” reached a key threshold Thursday when it submitted enough valid petition signatures to trigger a review by the Florida Supreme Court. To help fuel the effort, it collected $670,000 during September, bringing its overall contributions to $1,468,045.

The committee, which began raising money in July, has received money from Duke Energy, Florida Power & Light, Tampa Electric and Gulf Power. The utilities collectively accounted for $395,000 of Consumers for Smart Solar’s contributions in September, after pitching in $180,000 in August and $115,000 in July.

The committee’s largest contribution in September, $200,000, came from a Tallahassee-based group known as “Let’s Preserve the American Dream,” which was created as a non-profit social welfare organization.

A Tallahassee-based political-action committee with the same name lists its chairman as Ryan D. Tyson and its treasurer as Robert D. McRae, both officers with the powerful business-lobbying group Associated Industries of Florida. Tyson, in an email, said the Let’s Preserve the American Dream organizations are entirely different, with separate missions and purposes.

Associated Industries later released a statement and noted that, “If and when AIF does take an official position on either of the two proposed constitutional amendments regarding solar in Florida, we will release an official statement.”

The committee is seeking a constitutional amendment that would allow Floridians with solar equipment on their property to sell energy to power companies and “ensure that consumers who do not choose to install solar are not required to subsidize the costs of backup power and electric grid access to those who do.”

As of early Thursday afternoon, the state Division of Elections website reported that the committee — whose leadership includes two former state lawmakers, a Jacksonville tea-party founder and a former chairman of the Florida Public Service Commission — had submitted 68,792 valid signatures.

The state needed to validate 68,314 of the committee’s signatures to trigger a court review of the proposed ballot language..

The committee’s monthly fundraising total surpassed the $446,670 raised by “Floridians for Solar Choice,” which is spearheading the competing solar initiative. It had collected an overall total of $859,002 between December and Sept. 30.

Floridians for Solar Choice, which has most of its money coming from a political arm of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, is seeking to pass a constitutional amendment that, in part, would allow businesses to generate and sell up to two megawatts of solar power to customers on the same or neighboring properties.

Stephen Smith, of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, said this week that fundraising and signature collections continue, but they are expected to accelerate if the Florida Supreme Court rules that the initiative’s proposed ballot language meets legal requirements to go before voters in November 2016.

The court heard arguments Sept. 1 about the proposed ballot language. If Floridians for Solar Choice gets approval from the Supreme Court, it would need to submit a total of 683,149 valid petition signatures.

As of Thursday morning, it had submitted 182,660 valid signatures to the state Division of Elections. Major electric utilities oppose that ballot proposal.

by Jim Turner, The News Service of Florida

Comments

2 Responses to “Gulf Power, Other Utilities Continue To Fuel Solar Amendment”

  1. john on October 20th, 2015 6:36 am

    One must ask why almost all the time these green energy projects are politically driven and not market driven, I promise you someone’s pocket is getting lined as we speak at the taxpayers expense!!

    Green energy is not viable at 3X cost of fossil fuel.

  2. jeeperman on October 17th, 2015 5:34 pm

    Now I know which “solar” amendment to vote for.
    Obviously the power companies support the one that will not take from their bottom line.

Written by William Reynolds · Filed Under News