Latest Headlines
- FDOT Plans Traffic Shift Thursday In Century Highway 29 Construction Zone
- Molino Man Charged With Throwing Object, Breaking Windshield Of Passing Car
- ECUA Considering Water, Sewer And Sanitation Rate Increases
- Highway 4, Highway 168 Bridges Across North Escambia Remain Closed. Here’s An Update.
- Free Summer Lunch Available For Youth At Libraries In Escambia County
- AAA: Florida Gas Prices Dropped 18 Cents In 10 Days
- Potential Sinking Of SS United States Under Consideration For Escambia County As Artificial Reef
- M-Braves Sweep Blue Wahoos
- Two-Time Super Bowl Champ Inspires Local Youth Athletes (With Photo Gallery)
- Century Woman Charged With Meth Possession After Traffic Stop
Highway 97 Temporary Bridge Nears Completion
July 13, 2015
Work is nearing completion on a temporary bridge in Walnut Hill, part of the replacement of a 75-year old Highway 97 bridge over Little Pine Barren Creek in Walnut Hill.
Last week, the approach lanes to the temporary bridge were paved, after months of work that began on the structure at the end of March.
The work is part of a $2.5 million contract which consist of replacing the existing structurally deficient bridge, including roadway reconstruction, milling and resurfacing, guardrail, drainage, new signs and pavement markings. Drivers will utilize a temporary roadway and bridge during construction of the new bridge. Work is anticipated to be completed in the spring of 2016. No overweight loads will be permitted onto the temporary bridge (loads weighing over 88-thousand pounds).
The bridge is located at the intersection of Wiggins Lake Road, about one mile north of Ernest Ward Middle School. The bridge was constructed in 1940.
There’s no word yet from the Florida Department of Transportation as to when traffic will shift to the new temporary bridge.
Pictured: A temporary bridge nears completion on Highway 97 in Walnut Hill. NorthEscambia.com photos, click to enlarge.
Comments
8 Responses to “Highway 97 Temporary Bridge Nears Completion”
The land on the side where the temporary bridge is located is on a temporary use easement – the new bridge has to go where the old bridge is now. Buying property on either side would require new easements, setbacks, everything. Better to grant a temporary bridge easement.
Asphalt is the single most recycled construction material – other than dirt. When you consider that “temporary” is another word for “recyclable” – then the temporary bridge is recyclable, as well, and will be used in another bridge upgrade project when this one is over.
When you also consider that North Escambia also has a lot more people than it used to, and Highway 97 is now also the major traffic artery connecting the Poarch Casino to the wallets in Pensacola… the bridge needed to be replaced and quickly.
And quickly isn’t going to happen when you have so many test points in the process to meet, and the work is being done by men who are contracted to do just this one bridge, and are paid by the hour.
Why is it that when they pave a road, it tears up within a few years ? Yet when they pave the interstate road (with much more travel) it lasts until they do it again. Any answers ?
I live off of Wiggins Lake Road and I have wondered lately why they drove the amount of pilings that they did for the temporary bridge only to have to remove them in the end. The temporary bridge is far stronger than the original, why not use it forever. I guess that the powers that be in this state had a better idea?????? (the land that they used in building the “temporary” bridge can’t cost the state as much as the new “real” bridge does)
Seems like a waste of asphalt to lay it down then rip it back up.
Well William; You are very correct in that it is a state road, but the fact remains that they are going to a lot of expense building and tearing down extra bridges at the taxpayers expense. The state did the same thing on a much larger scale at the US Hwy 90 bridge in Milton. If anybody in State DOT were thinking, they could have built a new bridge, while at the same time straightening the curve out on the approach to the bridge without all the duplication. But after all, you have to ask yourself who benefits from such waste? Hmmmm, that’s a tough one
“M” it’s the state on this one, not the county.
Just Wondering; Why is it that the county builds two bridges, a temp one, then a replacement one. Then tears the temp one down, all at the expense of the taxpayers. Why don’t we just move the road over a little bit and build the replacement bridge to start with. Seems like a little bit of right of way purchased would be a lot cheaper than all this duplicated effort and expense.
Glad to see that bridge replaced. Hope they didn’t find any submerged automobiles in that creek like they did years ago. God rest her soul.