Latest Headlines
- Here’s Your Sign: Century Approves New $35,000 Electronic Message Center
- Escambia County Students Collect 14,540 Pounds Of Food For Manna
- Girl, 12, Killed In Multi-Vehicle Crash On Quintette Road In Pace
- Century Hires City Treasurer From Michigan As Their New Town Clerk
- Update: Suspect Shot By Escambia Deputies Now Charged With Attempted Homicide
- Eight Additional ‘Purple Star Schools’ Designated In Escambia County
- Two Escambia County Fires Add Red Bulbs To Fire Safety Wreath
- Century, UWF, Brownsville Cut From Early Voting Sites For Congressional Special Primary
- Salzman, Andrade Named To Florida House Leadership Positions
- Ernest Ward Middle Names Students, Employee Of The Month
Florida Appeals Court Orders Release Of Teacher Data
November 13, 2013
Teachers’ results under a Florida Department of Education formula meant to measure student learning must be released to the public, the 1st District Court of Appeal ruled Tuesday.
A unanimous three-judge panel sided with The Florida Times-Union — which had sought the release of the results from the “value added” model — and overturned a Leon County Circuit Court ruling sealing the records.
The appeals court rejected arguments by the state and a teachers union that the documents should be exempt under a part of state law that shields teacher evaluations from public view until the end of the following school year.
Circuit Judge John Cooper had ruled that, because teacher evaluations are often closely tied to the findings of the state model, releasing the records would essentially open up evaluations to the public. Cooper ruled that each year’s results should not be available to the public for three years.
The evaluations are based on three years of data. Under Cooper’s ruling, the results each year would have been delayed for three years, until they were no longer in use. So the 2009-10 results, for example, wouldn’t have been available until after the 2012-13 school year, instead of being available after 2010-11.
The three-year totals would have been available the year after they were used.
But the appeals court said Cooper’s ruling improperly expanded the personnel exemption.
“Had the Legislature wanted any matter material to a teacher’s evaluation to be exempt from disclosure, the Legislature would have exempted personnel files as a whole,” Judge William Van Nortwick wrote for the court. “To the contrary, personnel files of public school teachers are generally subject to disclosure.”
The dispute is in some ways an outgrowth of the fierce battle over a performance-pay law that passed the Legislature in 2011. Teachers unions bitterly opposed the bill, which led to the Department of Education formula to measure student learning.
But the Florida Education Association, the largest union, joined the Department of Education in fighting the Times-Union’s request for the records. In a statement following the decision, FEA President Andy Ford urged the public to be careful when considering the results when they were released.
Ford said the model is “deeply flawed,” and that many teachers are no longer evaluated based on test scores because of more recent legislation.
”The evaluation data on teachers that is about to be made public is meaningless, which is why we joined in to enforce the public records exemption and prevent it from being published,” Ford said. “The numbers to be released are subject to misinterpretation. They have not been put in their proper context.”
A spokesman for the Florida Department of Education said Tuesday afternoon that the agency was still studying the decision.
by Brandon Larrabee, The News Service of Florida
Comments
5 Responses to “Florida Appeals Court Orders Release Of Teacher Data”
If you really want to see how the teachers are truly rated, please call the school and ask the administration to show you the pre-VAM teacher ratings. The Value Added Model (VAM) is NOT a true measurement of the teacher’s abilities. It is a ridiculous formula that takes a lot of non-classroom related factors into account and makes a prediction of what they teacher should be accomplishing instead of what has been accomplished.
Teachers can only do as well as the students, and parents, do. After all, as the old saying goes, “You can bring a horse to water, but you can make it drink.” Teachers can do what they need to do, but if the students, and parents, are not willing to do their part in learning, the process will eventually fail.
Who is really to blame?
Here’s what will NOT be mentioned in the media or explained by the Appeals court because neither group has any idea what our job entails… 50% of our evaluation is based on our performance and 50% of our evaluation is based on the fcat results at our school. For easy math, let’s say I am the very best teacher in the county at the very lowest performing school, the population that needs us the most. My evaluation would be somewhere around the middle. So let me clarify, I’m not concerned with anyone seeing my evaluation, I’m concerned with the public being mislead or misinformed regarding my evaluation.
Well said David H. G.
Pardon me for not reading the whole article…Teachers’ results under a Florida Department of Education formula meant to measure student learning must be released to the public, the 1st District Court of Appeal ruled Tuesday….is all I needed to see.
I believe as a parent of a student we DESERVE to see what the teachers are capable of. If they are NOT performing to their degrees they should be replaced, period. My child’s education is put into the hands of teachers that state they are qualified, but are they really? Something I am for 110%. I’ve always done my own investigation on the staff and teachers my son comes into contact with and will continue to do so.
They spent our money gathering information they claim is meaningless?
I bet there is SOME value there even if digging is required.
David for proper tools