Latest Headlines
- Acres Of Christmas Lights, Hayride, Goats In Pajamas At Run-a-muck Ranch In Bratt
- It’s The First Day Of Winter: Cold Saturday; Freezing Tonight
- No Serious Injuries In Bratt Rollover Crash
- Escambia County’s First Wawa Store Now Open; Four More Planned
- Atmore Man Charged With Fleeing, Striking Officer With Four-Wheeler
- FHP Charges Molino Man With DUI After Traffic Crash
- Santa Visits Molino Library (With Photo Gallery)
- Former Aggie Ronnie Douglas Named New Head Coach At Milton
- Escambia EMS CORE Program Marks 200th Opioid Recovery Patient
- Here’s Your Sign: Century Approves New $35,000 Electronic Message Center
Walnut Hill Man Accused Of Violating Federal Supervised Release
March 15, 2013
A Walnut Hill man appeared in federal court Thursday on an accusation that he violated the terms of his supervised released in a 2003 drug and weapons case.
Gary Glenn Roley surrendered to U.S. Marshals Wednesday. During Thursday morning’s court appearance, U.S. District Judge Charles J. Kahn, Jr. found probable cause and ordered that the conditions of Roley’s release be modified and he be released.
Roley was placed on a curfew, restricted to his residence from 7 p.m. until 5:30 a.m. daily. His travel was restricted to Escambia County, Florida, and he is required to check in with a pretrial services officer no later than noon each Monday.
In 2003, Roley was convicted of the intent to sell, distribute or dispense a controlled substance and unlawful transport of firearms. He was sentenced to 118 months in federal prison, followed by three years supervised release.
In July 2012, Roley was convicted in Escambia County Circuit Court on a first degree misdemeanor charge of possession of drug paraphernalia, according to court records.
Comments
5 Responses to “Walnut Hill Man Accused Of Violating Federal Supervised Release”
When you’re already on the radar, you don’t do things to stand out. Hope he learns the second time around.
REGARDING:
“This is my father & before you go to pointimg fingers traash talking read where it says he was accused.. ”
It reads like he was accused based on the fact that he has been convicted of the violation during the probation period. Pretty solid case since he’s legally guilty already of that of which he’s accused.
David for math and better people
not accusing, just counting
Set them straight Britt if that is who were thinking her walls are screaming. Anyone can be accused. And if he is using again he needs all our prayers no one knows a persons addiction more than the individual who is addicted and if its true he is still loved by so many and i pray he gets help quick…
This is my father & before you go to pointimg fingers traash talking read were it says he waas accused.. & many of you some of witch one has already commented has no room to point fingers either way it goes
Love you daddy glad your home(:
If only them walls could talk…….