Latest Headlines
- Cat Country 98.7 Is The 2024 CMA Radio Station Of The Year (With Gallery)
- Gonzalez Man Gets Two Life Sentences For Abusing Children
- One Airlifted After Highway 97 Rear End Crash
- Semi, Pickup Crash Closes Highway 29 For Hours In Cantonment
- Now That Matt Gaetz Has Resigned After Being Picked For Trump’s AG, Who Will Seek His Seat?
- Learn How To Break Down A Chicken At The Molino Library
- Escambia Man Dies In Two Vehicle Crash
- Flomaton Man Arrested In Atmore For Possession of Fentanyl, Cocaine
- Escambia Man Sentenced to 25 Years for Fentanyl Trafficking
- Tate High Softball’s Kara Wine Signs With The University of South Alabama
Walnut Hill Man Accused Of Violating Federal Supervised Release
March 15, 2013
A Walnut Hill man appeared in federal court Thursday on an accusation that he violated the terms of his supervised released in a 2003 drug and weapons case.
Gary Glenn Roley surrendered to U.S. Marshals Wednesday. During Thursday morning’s court appearance, U.S. District Judge Charles J. Kahn, Jr. found probable cause and ordered that the conditions of Roley’s release be modified and he be released.
Roley was placed on a curfew, restricted to his residence from 7 p.m. until 5:30 a.m. daily. His travel was restricted to Escambia County, Florida, and he is required to check in with a pretrial services officer no later than noon each Monday.
In 2003, Roley was convicted of the intent to sell, distribute or dispense a controlled substance and unlawful transport of firearms. He was sentenced to 118 months in federal prison, followed by three years supervised release.
In July 2012, Roley was convicted in Escambia County Circuit Court on a first degree misdemeanor charge of possession of drug paraphernalia, according to court records.
Comments
5 Responses to “Walnut Hill Man Accused Of Violating Federal Supervised Release”
When you’re already on the radar, you don’t do things to stand out. Hope he learns the second time around.
REGARDING:
“This is my father & before you go to pointimg fingers traash talking read where it says he was accused.. ”
It reads like he was accused based on the fact that he has been convicted of the violation during the probation period. Pretty solid case since he’s legally guilty already of that of which he’s accused.
David for math and better people
not accusing, just counting
Set them straight Britt if that is who were thinking her walls are screaming. Anyone can be accused. And if he is using again he needs all our prayers no one knows a persons addiction more than the individual who is addicted and if its true he is still loved by so many and i pray he gets help quick…
This is my father & before you go to pointimg fingers traash talking read were it says he waas accused.. & many of you some of witch one has already commented has no room to point fingers either way it goes
Love you daddy glad your home(:
If only them walls could talk…….