Two Charged With Holding Man Hostage For $300 Drug Debt

June 15, 2012

Two Escambia County men are charged with kidnapping a man and holding him hostage for ransom to settle up a $300 drug debt.

Michael Shawn Hastings, 39, and Nathan Anton Vazques, 33, were both charged with kidnapping an adult for ransom. Both were booked into the Escambia County Jail with bond set at $50,000.

The victim’s wife told Escambia County Sheriff’s deputies that she received a call at 1:30 in the morning from a man calling himself “Slick” informing her that her husband was being held captive until she delivered $300 in cash to the Bayou Grande trailer park. She was told, according to the Sheriff’s Office, to come alone and not call the police.

As the victim’s wife was talking to a deputy, another call demanding the ransom cash came in, and the deputy was able to listen as the caller detailed where to take the cash and what the persons she needed to meet look like.

More deputies were dispatched to the Bayou Grand trailer park where Hastings and Vazques were detained.

The victim had escaped his captors and was found a short distance away. He told deputies that a guy he knew as “Nate” forced him to get money for the narcotics he had used. He drove him to an ATM, but he was unable to get the cash at which time he was beaten up and taken back to the trailer park.  Then “Nate” and another male began calling his wife demanding the $300, he reported to deputies.

Comments

14 Responses to “Two Charged With Holding Man Hostage For $300 Drug Debt”

  1. JM on June 17th, 2012 10:52 am

    I wondered if there were two of them or if this Slick was the same one
    they were looking for in Molino. This time they need to throw away
    the key.

  2. hmmm on June 17th, 2012 7:35 am

    do you guys remember a guy name slick from some article a while back? he wasnt so Slick this time.

  3. Richard on June 16th, 2012 8:17 pm

    Thank ypu William for reporting what is happening when others won’t

  4. William on June 16th, 2012 7:59 am

    >>Why not publish the victims name?

    As a matter of policy, we don’t publish the names of victims in most circumstances.

  5. Jimbo on June 16th, 2012 7:17 am

    Why not publish the victims name?

  6. BBunny on June 15th, 2012 6:28 pm

    more proof that you just cant fix stupid!

  7. REALLY! on June 15th, 2012 12:44 pm

    Really! This is ALL illegal! ITS DRUG DEALING…. Just trying to get their money back…. What a bunch of crap!

  8. becky on June 15th, 2012 10:48 am

    they were just trying to get their money back.

  9. David Huie Green on June 15th, 2012 9:38 am

    So one gentleman buys psychoactive chemicals from other gentlemen but doesn’t pay for his purchase. The other gentlemen take extreme measures to get paid. It is possible the other gentlemen’s minds were also in an altered state unless they are usually stupid as all get out.

    Still, it brought back a fond memory. My mother had been in the hospital and Daddy went to take her home. The hospital explained he had to pay her bill before he coult leave with her. Daddy explained that kidnapping was illegal and he WAS taking her home.

    GOOD TIMES.

  10. Mnon on June 15th, 2012 8:25 am

    I don’t think I’d admit to having any dealings with either of these clowns. They both look as if they belong in prison. Go tell the cops if they stole money from you… unless it was for other illegal activity, if so no sympathy here.

  11. k on June 15th, 2012 6:33 am

    “No honor among theives”

  12. mr unknown on June 15th, 2012 5:34 am

    I have had to deal with Vazques on several occations so this is no surprise. I dont understand how he keeps on getting out.

  13. jennifer on June 15th, 2012 4:10 am

    THEY STOLE 80 DOLLARS FROM ME EARLIER THAT EVENING

  14. SFC on June 15th, 2012 2:40 am

    Dumb & dumber?