Florida Gov’t Weekly Roundup: Let’s Get To Work On The Session

November 20, 2011

The occasional chill in the air — what passes for a chill in Tallahassee — sent signals that 2011 was drawing to an end. But with an early session slated for 2012 to deal with redistricting, lawmakers were beginning to lay the groundwork for the major proposals of the coming year.

Except, it seemed, for the redistricting debate that prompted the early starting gun.

http://www.northescambia.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/floridaweeklly.jpgWhile the Senate Reapportionment Committee put the finishing touches on its instructions for drawing up a proposed committee bill, the House panel tasked with the once-a-decade redrawing of Florida’s political boundaries hit the pause button. A committee meeting and three sub-committee get-togethers were all canceled, prompting yelps from Democrats that they weren’t getting the full story on the delays.

But even without a slate of redistricting meetings, there were plenty of political hot potatoes to deal with, from destination resorts to insurance reform to a pair of contentious claims bills.

GAMBLING BOOM OR BUST?

The lobbying war over the future of gambling in Florida heated up during the week, with some parts of the business community going all-in to support bringing massive luxury casinos to South Florida. Associated Industries of Florida put its cards on the table, saying it would make the approval of a destination resorts bill its highest priority in the 2012 session.

Among the other groups pushing lawmakers to adopt the proposal were the Latin Builders Association and the Florida United Business Association, with all of the supporters saying that the state could hit a jackpot worth tens of thousands of jobs.

Others business groups say the bill was nothing but bad luck. The Florida Chamber of Commerce has lined up with Disney and the Florida Retail Federation to say the proposal isn’t worth it.

But even after the first committee meeting on the proposal, it wasn’t clear where the chips might fall. The meeting of the Senate Regulated Industries Committee featured a lobbyist saying “bulls**t” and a panoply of concerns from all sides.

The bill could lead to expansions of gambling in the rest of the state, some opponents noted, though gambling interests said no other part of the state would support the $2 billion minimum investments required by the bill.

“There would be opportunity for this across the state of Florida if the bill was structured differently,” said Alan Feldman, senior vice president of MGM Resorts. “At $2 billion, this is a South Florida bill.”

But even some gambling lobbyists were skittish about having too many players at the table. Andy Abboud, vice president of government relations for Las Vegas Sands, told lawmakers to be careful about “market saturation.” And pari-mutuel racetracks were worried about the competition.

The only thing guaranteed was a roll of the dice. Senate President Mike Haridopolos told reporters Wednesday “we will have a vote on some type of destination resorts bill on the floor up or down. This is not me pushing members to vote yes or no.”

PIP SQUAWKING

Also debuting this week: An assault on fraud that Gov. Rick Scott and others say is costing motorists almost $1 billion a year in higher car-insurance premiums. Scott kicked off the drive to change things, holding a press conference with Cabinet members, law enforcement officers and industry lobbyists and blaming staged crashes, bogus clinics and unnecessary medical procedures for raising the cost of personal injury protection insurance.

“It’s a $900 million tax on consumers,” Scott told reporters and lobbyists representing physicians, hospitals, plaintiff’s attorneys, providers and insurance companies. “.. Crashes are down but costs are up. That makes absolutely no sense. It’s happening because our current laws are being taken advantage of.”

The next day, House and Senate members began gauging proposals that would make a number of changes to rules surrounding the $10,000 benefit created in the 1970s to encourage injured motorists to seek medical attention and stay out of court.

A House proposal would limit rates and the number of chiropractic or massage treatments within a 12-month period for accident victims, cap attorneys fees for legal cases and ban benefits to recipients who submit fraudulent or exaggerated claims. Insurance companies would also face new regulations.

The Senate also began looking at efforts to craft a solution at a midweek hearing. Likely areas would include placing restrictions or bans on attorney referral services, a move supported by Chief Financial Officer Jeff Atwater. Sen. Joe Negron, R-Stuart, hinted other likely areas to be addressed include requiring clinics to be headed by physicians, and some limitations on the number of procedures allowed during the course of treatment.

But supporters of the crackdown saw a potential speed bump in the fierce debate ahead.

“It’s going to be a war,” said House Insurance and Banking Subcommittee Chairman Bryan Nelson, R-Apopka. “It’s not a bill that everybody is going to say yes, yes, yes…. the chiropractors won’t like it, the docs maybe won’t like it, the trial attorneys won’t like it.”

CLAIMING VICTORIES?

Two claims bills that are priorities of Senate President Mike Haridopolos also got started along the legislative path, but one of them still threatened to turn into a lobbyist food-fight.

The Senate Rules Committee voted 9-1 to move forward with SB 4, which calls for the Broward County Sheriff’s Office to pay $15.575 million to Eric Brody, who suffered debilitating injuries in a 1998 car accident with a sheriff’s deputy.

A lobbyist for the sheriff’s office insurer said the bill is part of “scheme” by Brody’s attorneys to bring what is known as a bad-faith lawsuit against his client despite the insurer’s willingness to pay $8.5 million to Brody to settle the dispute but has been rebuffed.

But Lance Block, an attorney for Brody, said $8.5 million would not cover the costs to care for the Broward County man, who suffered brain damage and was in a coma for six months after the accident.

Rules Chairman John Thrasher, R-St. Augustine, implored the two sides to try to reach an agreement to end the dispute.

“This case cries out to be resolved,” Thrasher said. “Eric Brody needs to be helped.”

Haridopolos has made a priority of passing claims bills to provide money to Brody and William Dillon, who spent 27 years in prison after being wrongfully convicted in a 1981 murder in Brevard County. The bills could pass the Senate during the first week of the 2012 legislative session.

Haridopolos highlighted the bills when they died in the chaotic denouement of last year’s legislative session, and has repeatedly vowed to push them through this year. He renewed a promise on the Dillon Tuesday. This year, Haridopolos said he sees no reason not to make it known to the House that it is a priority for him to pass the bill.

“The House is very well aware of this bill,” Haridopolos said, saying he didn’t think the house “will want to play games anymore,” and urged them to “do the right thing.”

LEAVING THE TAJ MAHAL

But at least one Capitol saga seemed to be inching toward a conclusion. Embattled First District Court of Appeal Judge and noted vinegar-lover Paul Hawkes said he would resign Jan. 4, ending one chapter of the embarrassing saga over the court’s lavish new headquarters and short-circuiting an inquiry into Hawkes’ role in the controversy.

Hawkes’ resignation letter to Scott never mentioned the looming Judicial Qualifications Commission hearing set to begin Jan. 30, but the case has drawn attention for the sharply critical legal briefings filed by both sides, which had included quotes from former Gov. Jeb Bush, Alice in Wonderland and Shakespeare to highlight their points.

The crux of the dispute, though, was Hawkes role in the construction of his court’s lavish new building on the outskirts of Tallahassee and what Special Counsel Wallace Pope characterized as Hawkes’ browbeating and demeaning style of leadership.

But there were also fears that shutting down the JQC hearings could keep Floridians in the dark about how the proposal for a new home for the court morphed into the palatial “Taj Mahal” courthouse.

“The taxpayers, the citizens of Florida, will never get many questions answered, unfortunately,” said Sen. Mike Fasano, a New Port Richey Republican who was one of Hawkes’ most vocal critics.

Along those lines, House Democratic Leader Ron Saunders called for an investigation into how Florida lawmakers funded the $50 million structure.

“I am concerned that as we enter a legislative session where budget cuts will be considered that could cause great harm to needy infants and senior citizens, it remains unclear how this lavish facility got approved for funding,” Saunders, D-Key West, wrote in a letter to House Appropriations Committee chairwoman Rep. Denise Grimsley, R-Sebring.

STORY OF THE WEEK: The debate over a controversial proposal to bring luxury casinos to Florida — expected to be one of the most heavily-lobbied measures in the 2012 legislative session — begins in earnest.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK: “I had three points I was going to make and I thought, ‘Oh boy. I hope I remember the three.’” –Gov. Rick Scott, to The Palm Beach Post, talking about his interview with the paper’s editorial board. Scott was referring to a gaffe by Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Scott’s political hero, during a recent presidential debate.

By Brandon Larrabee
The News Service of Florida

Comments

2 Responses to “Florida Gov’t Weekly Roundup: Let’s Get To Work On The Session”

  1. David Huie Green on November 21st, 2011 9:49 am

    REGARDING:
    ” – - – ending one chapter of the embarrassing saga over the court’s lavish new headquarters and short-circuiting an inquiry into Hawkes’ role in the controversy. – - – “The taxpayers, the citizens of Florida, will never get many questions answered, unfortunately,” said Sen. Mike Fasano, a New Port Richey Republican who was one of Hawkes’ most vocal critics.

    “Along those lines, House Democratic Leader Ron Saunders called for an investigation into how Florida lawmakers funded the $50 million structure.”

    Yep, the judge proposed the spending for whatever reason, our legislators approved it for whatever reason. Knowing those reasons should be interesting and might well send a few folks to prison. Not that our prisons need more inmates but we might could do with a few fewer politicians.

    One does wonder if the resignation was related to the desire to not implicate others or go to jail himself.

    David for funding elaborate public structures
    to put the rest of us in our places

  2. 429SCJ on November 21st, 2011 7:25 am

    I think it is wonderful that our elected officals are developing an interest in preventing fraud, to taxpayers. I do not know if this is a crsis of consience or just common sense, as it takes a thief to catch a thief.

Written by William Reynolds · Filed Under News