Latest Headlines
- A Very Good Boy: ECSO K-9 Streeter Awarded Medal Of Courage For Jumping Off Bridge After Suspect
- Plans Refiled For Circle K At Highway 95A, Quintette Road; Intersection Improvements Proposed
- Escambia School Board Buys 36 Acres For $3.9 Million For New Beulah School
- Head On Crash Injures Two In Beulah
- FWC Removes 14 Boaters For Boating Under The Influence During Blue Angels Air Show
- Century Spending Over $3.3 Million On Five Sewage Lift Stations
- Escambia Man Gets Life Sentence For Murdering Roommate Before Staging Her Drowning
- Catholic’s TJ McCants Drafted By Chicago White Sox
- Man Gets 50 Years In Prison For 2022 Murder At Cantonment Gas Station
- Pedestrian Checking Trailer Tire Struck By Car In Two Vehicle Crash Near Century
Bond Revoked For Pharmacy Robbery Suspect
March 14, 2011
The woman accused of being the getaway car driver in last September’s armed robbery at a Molino pharmacy is back behind bars.
Judge Ronald Swanson granted Assistant State Attorney Jeff Gaddy’s request to revoke bond for Krystal Lynn Collins, 24. She is facing multiple charges in connection with the robbery at Scott’s Pharmacy, including robbery with a firearm, two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and multiple felony drug charges.
According to the Escambia County Sheriff’s Office, deputies believe Collins drove the getaway car and took part in the robbery with Joseph Daniel Flowers of Molino. Flowers, who was allegedly wearing underwear on his head at the time of the holdup, is using the insanity defense.
Flowers was later charged with beating Collins with a two liter bottle of Coke in an unrelated incident.
Both Collins and Flowers remain in the Escambia County Jail without bond.
Pictured: Krystal Lynn Collins (with blond hair in September, 2010) was briefly taken into custody after the September, 2010 robbery of Scott’s Pharmacy in Molino. The inset on the photograph shows her current mugshot. NorthEscambia.com/courtesy photos, click to enlarge.
Comments
19 Responses to “Bond Revoked For Pharmacy Robbery Suspect”
The sad thing is with a mothers love and strong guidance this
girl would have had a chance for a good life AND she could have
been beautiful inside and out.
This girl makes me cry for all kids that went wrong and never
stood a chance. Thats why we need to clean this town up and get
the bad ones, so the young ones are not influenced and their
heros are not bad neighbors.
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
lol sure i’m jealous of a thief/drug addict who is ugly inside and out.
don’t be jealous
Horrific thinks you ALL need new GLASSES!
Well if you guys thing this girl is pretty, your sure easy to please. hahahaha!
I am sure you do have glasses David, But I must assume they are more like Beer Goggles!!!!
I’m just glad ECSO is rounding up the trash in this part of the county & takin it where it belongs.
DAVID—YOU DID ONE FINE JOB OF GETTING BACK INTO THE GOOD GRACES OF YOUR BRIDE. SMOOTH MOVE.
Looks way better as a blonde. But still far from pretty! Im probably in the minority but I still believe innocent until proven guilty. Although sometimes (like this) its obvious who is guilty, they still have their rights.
What a stark contrast between the two pictures. There is a very good example of what drugs does to you. No it’s not just the hair color look at the complexion ther is a huge difference. I do have to agree with David blonde looks better on her.
I agree, she looks MUCH better as a blonde.
David,
I prefer to think that most women, like fine wines, improve with age. I know I have anyway. I look a lot better than I did in high school.
Wow!!! thinking it will be David who bonds her out!
Paul, you are so wrong!! She DOES look better as a blonde!! Male chauvinist finally agreeing with David.
bond revoked,ummm….really??
REGARDING:
“Paul thinkin David needs glasses”
I HAVE glasses. I must admit most women looked prettier before I got them but most are still beautiful enough, especially my lovely bride.
David separating appearances from actions
Should have never got bail in the first place. Silly liberals and your slap on the wrist agenda.
I wonder if he figured wearing the underwear on his head would help him with an insanity defense? Paul thinkin David needs glasses….
Yes, they always need a reason. Otherwise your Constitutional rights as an accused don’t exist. Breaking terms of release, increased danger of flight, other crimes while out. There’s probably other reasons to revoke. It doesn’t spell out which one the judge thinks she violated.
David thinking she makes a pretty blonde
Was there a reason for the bond to be revoked? Do they even need a reason?