Latest Headlines
- Merry Christmas! The Story Of The Greatest Gift Of All
- First Responders Put On Christmas Light Show For Children’s Hospital Patients (With Gallery)
- House Ethics Releases Scathing Report On Matt Gaetz
- Photos: Christmas Activities At Jim Allen Elementary
- Here’s The Christmas Closure And Trash Schedule You Need To Know
- Letters To Santa From Byrneville Elementary Third Graders
- Cause Of ‘Major’ Fire At Ascend Remains Under Investigation
- Letters To Santa From Byrneville Elementary Second Graders
- Fire Destroys Mobile Home Being Used For Storage Near McDavid
- Photos: Gingerbread House Day At Lipscomb Elementary
County Won’t Hire Smokers Under New Policy; Insurance Changes Coming
July 27, 2008
No smoking…that’s the word from the Escambia County Commission. If you smoke, don’t expect to get an Escambia County job.
The county has adopted a strict no smoking policy effective October 1. The mandatory drug test will include a test for tobacco usage after that date. If a person tests positive for tobacco, they will not be hired for any county position.
The no smoking policies adopted by the commission go even further. Effective October 1, there will be no smoking within 50 feet of an entrance or exit of any county building. That ban will be expanded in 2010 to include all county property…no county employee may smoke anywhere on county property.
The no smoking rules are part of a sweeping change to the county’s health benefits, all designed to improved employee health and save money.
County employee health insurance will be going up on October 1 by an average of almost 25 percent. An employee that participates in the top-tier plan with single coverage will see their rates jump for $60 a month to almost $80 a month.
Almost 200 Medicare-eligible retirees that are on the county’s health plan will face a $50 a month increase or be forced to switch plans to one called BlueMedicare at an increase of $16 per month.
Other parts of the county’s health plan changes include:
- Consolidate life insurance coverage under a single provider, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, in exchange for which BCBS will donate $250,000 for the construction of wellness centers in the county, with the wellness centers to be equipped with funding from the Employee Morale & Wellness Fund.
- Attempt to increase the size of the health insurance pool through alliances with other entities such as the School Board and the City of Pensacola.
- Investigate consolidating the health and dental Insurances under a single carrier.
- Make mandatory the pre-taxing of employee deductions for health, life, dental, and vision (insurance), which means the deductions can only be changed during open enrollment or for a qualifying event; all other forms of benefit deductions will remain voluntary.
- In fiscal year 2009-2010, offer employees a tobacco-free discount of 5% on the employees’ portion of the health insurance, with employees to sign an affidavit attesting to their commitment to remain tobacco free to receive the discount, with the county to randomly drug-test employees to ensure compliance, and with employees found in non-compliance to lose their discount.
- In fiscal year 2009-2010, drop the county-sponsored Long-Term Disability Program and develop an optional program for employees to buy into. If possible, this program will be discontinued in fiscal year 2008-2009, at a cost savings to the county of approximately $70,000.
Comments
13 Responses to “County Won’t Hire Smokers Under New Policy; Insurance Changes Coming”
Absolutely ridiculous. This is discrimination. What about those who go out drinking on the weekends or during the week. I think alcohol is a bigger concern, not only directly putting yourself and others at risk (car accidents, violence, etc) but also putting your employer at risk. The government are the ones who put this product in our hands, accepted it, marked it with their seal and taxes so they could make more money off of us… and now that people are hooked on it, they try to keep them from getting jobs. Absolutely the wrong way to go about this. It’s disgusting to me to read this… If they really care, they’d pull cigarettes off the shelves and stop making money off them and they’d put their money into helping people get better. Our government is the most ridiculous system. If you disagree, then you better be 100% healthy… because it could be you next, who doesn’t have a job.
I think it is a great start. To all the smokers, if you can figure out a way to smoke your cigarette and keep the smoke away from others, go ahead and smoke. Non-smokers also have rights. We have the right to breathe clean air and not have to smell like a stale cigarette. You know the risks, if you want to still smoke do it but keep innocent adults and children from having to breath the second hand smoke. Maybe they should have everyone that smokes put on a helmet that will keep the smoke in their face and let them breathe it . Just a thought.
You guys are missing the point. They aren’t making the new policy to stop people from doing nasty habits or to mess with people’s rights!!! UNHEALTHY LIFESTYLES cause health problems that the insurance companies are tired of footing the bill for. Like John says above, you have a right to keep on smoking and coughing your lungs up, but if you want in on one of the last stable jobs in Pensacola, then you should understand their right to be picky about who works for them. Stop getting so defensive and get on the train. It will make the world a better place.
I am all for saving money and I have never smoked. It is easy to point your finger and say someone is bad for costing more in healthcare. BUT WAIT, what will be next? Diabetes runs in your family – to bad, won’t hire you. Cancer runs in your family or even worse you have had cancer and survived (how dare you). Oh what if it comes back. Maybe we should not hire you either. Getting older, oh my, that means more dollars in health cost. Maybe we should only hire young people because they should be healthier. Maybe we should fire everyone by the time they turn 50! The sky is the limit!
Yes, the employer may save a few hundred dollars, but the employee who quits gains 5 to ten years of life. I assume the union who agreed to it is not for early death. When it comes to healthcare cost, the employer should give everyone insentives to change their lifestyle. Those who do not smoke, exercise 30 minutes a day and have their numbers in control, are paying for those who do not.
I believe its a good idea plus who doesn’t want to live a bit longer to reap from all the years of hard work you invest at a company. With insurance premiums going up every year a smoking person could quit smoking and use that money and put it to work on a 401or a deferred comp.at the place of employment and have a bigger nest egg for retirement or a smoker can keep smoking and retire and pull and oxygen bottle behind and have someone push them around in a wheelchair.
The county is doing what is best for its employees and residents. The county is reducing costs. I assume the county’s taxes contribute to the premiums that cover the employees’ health insurance. I assume employees pay a portion of the premium for their health insurance. If the health insurance premiums are lower for the employees and tax payers due to the smoking ban then it is the right thing to do. A non-smoking employee should ask why someone else’s nasty habit should cost the non-smoking employee more of his/her hard earned money. The research is clear connecting smoking to dramatic health problems. You’re still free to smoke… but not on someone else’s dime.
your right smoking isn’t healthy but neither is eating fried foods, over eating. I suppose b/c heart problems and diabetes run in my family that i wont be able to get a county job.
Regardless, lets say the government gets more Americans to stop smoking and they all live 10+yrs longer than if they would of smoked. Thats a big chunk of social security and medicare that will be spent than letting people have the right to choose to smoke and possibly die from it.
I do agree with what John said, its the employers right to pick and choose their employees. There just has to be a limit on how far the insurance companies will go. Nobody wants to be singled out for a nasty habit, a lil fun having a drink, or something as silly as the genes that run in your family.
On another hand, i come from a family of nurses so if you want to smoke… Thank you for keeping my family employeed.
It’s all about HEALTH yall. Smoking is not healthy for ANYONE.
Smoking is not illegal. We can prohibit smoking in areas that endangers others. How can we not hire them just because they smoke? Is that legal? We can not discriminate due to race or gender. This is not private business, it is county government. Poor eating habits and inactivity are unhealthy as well. Mabe we shouldn’t hire the fat and lazy.
You still have your freedom. You have the freedom to smoke anytime you choose. The county has the freedom to hire or not hire who they see fit.
You have the freedom to seek employment from another employer.
Where did the freedom go makes me wonder, i say the same thing what next keep going and we want be able to go out of our homes and do anything. Our freedom in amercia is changing everyday and that is very sad. so many people need jobs and now they want to make it even harder for people even if they do have a nasty habit can’t be no worse than anything else, yeah i know we know we need to show kindness to others and respect thoughs who don’t smoke but come on i think that is just going very much over board. Yeah keep it up people the world we live in today is getting worse and worse.
I don’t smoke and i applaude the efforts. I guess this means no going anywhere that people might contract second hand smoke. Concerts, bars, clubs, patio’s of some restraunts, most creeks, and the beach. I wonder whats next? I guess they’ll try to take my beer from me, haha!